Supreme Court
January 13th, 2006...
Supremely Confident
As the freight train that is Samuel Alito barrels towards Confirmation Station, Democratic opponents are left to create the illusion that they're actually doing something to stop it.
Aside from boldly questioning the qualifications of the United States Postal Service, they've begun hinting at the possibility of a filibuster (the new f-bomb) that everyone and their constituents and their constituents' dog know isn't going to happen. Behold, the incomparable Chuck Schumer:
Laurie Kellman - January 13th, 2006 "I don't think he's going to get many votes from Democrats on the committee," Sen. Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat on the committee, told CBS' "The Early Show." "As for a filibuster, it's something we'll have to discuss. So it's not on the table or off the table right now."
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought that anything that was not off the table was, by definition, on the table.
Meanwhile, while the threat of a filibuster hovers above the proceedings (apparently literally), the Democrats on the committee seek to delay the vote.
Bold Prediction: The Alito vote on committee will go something like 12-6, and the vote on the Senate floor will yield approximately 65 votes; including all 55 Republican Senators.
July 6th, 2005...
War of the Words
Kudos to Mark Coffey of Decision '08 for taking notice of Alberto Gonzales' surge in the TradeSports market. This has made a few conservatives uncomfortable, as they doubt Gonzales' conservative credentials.
However, they may have little to fear, as Drudge is reporting that Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) is expecting a more conservative nomination:
Drudge Report - July 6th, 2005 Senate Judiciary Committee member Chuck Schumer got busy plotting away on the cellphone aboard a Washington, DC-New York Amtrak -- plotting Democrat strategy for the upcoming Supreme Court battle.
Schumer promised a fight over whoever the President’s nominee was: “It's not about an individual judge… It's about how it affects the overall makeup of the court.”
The chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee was overheard on a long cellphone conversation with an unknown political ally, and the DRUDGE REPORT was there!
Schumer proudly declared: “We are contemplating how we are going to go to war over this.”
Schumer isn't necessarily on top of everything, but he's presumably more in the know than us humble bloggers, so his pessimism over some kind of compromise (such as nominating Gonzales, fairly moderate under the circumstances) doesn't bode well for those looking to avoid a fight.
February 22nd, 2005...
NY Times: Rehnquist to Leave in June
After all the speculation about Rehnquist stepping down the New York Times has...well, a little bit more speculation:
Neil A. Lewis & Linda Greenhouse - February 22nd, 2005 "The thinking, clearly, is that the chief will retire in June," said a person who has participated in these discussions. "The question is, of course, is whether he will be able to endure until then."
No one, from the most high-level administration officials to those on the periphery of the discussions, agreed to be quoted by name, both because the discussions are confidential and, just as important, because it is considered unseemly to discuss someone's serious illness.
One would think it'd also be unseemly, then, to write newspaper articles about someone's serious illness.
So, who to nominate? If I have any areas of genuine expertise at all (unlikely), potential Supreme Court nominees certainly would not be among them. Thankfully, we have Eugene Volokh. He likes John Roberts.
Hey! What about Condi for Supreme Court Justice? Who wants to open the Cafe Press account?
|
|
Calendar
More Entries
Blogroll
Instapundit
Andrew Sullivan
Tom Maguire
Decision '08
Patrick O'Keefe
Categories
Blogging
Democrats
Economy
Elections '04
Elections '06
Elections '08
Entertainment
George W. Bush
Iraq
Media
Miscellaneous
Republicans
Social Security
Supreme Court
Technology
War on Terror
Email Me
|